international relations and settler colonialism: cfp

International Relations: This elision is particularly troubling considering that the dominant institutional geography of IR often overlaps with and occupies lands claimed by Indigenous peoples. IR’s silence on this front enables the world’s remaining settler colonies to perpetuate laws and everyday practices that seek the erasure of Indigenous peoples from the realm of the ‘international’, reinforcing their tenuous claims to territorial integrity and sovereignty in the process.
The 2008 UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP) is a crucial document that clearly ‘internationalizes’ the rights of Indigenous peoples by recognizing: inherent rights of self-determination; sovereignty in governance of lands, resources, and social reproduction; and Indigenous-settler treaty relationships. Historical studies have also demonstrated the extent to which encounters between European colonial powers and Indigenous peoples were generative of key categories of international law. From its emergence to the present day, settler-colonialism manages its inter-national relations with Indigenous peoples by attempting to contain settler-Indigenous relationships within the framework of domestic politics. This colonial maneuver continues to generate multiple sites of contestation in world politics, as most recently seen with the #IdleNoMore movement.

settler colonial studies blog

CALL FOR PAPERS
INTERNATIONAL STUDIES ASSOCIATION – TORONTO (2014)
26-29 March, 2014.
Settler-Colonial Spaces:
Thinking Across Indigeneity and International Relations
As the ISA moves from Ohlone territories (San Francisco) to Mississauga and Haudenosaunee territories (Toronto) for its annual convention next year, this is a call to reflect on the international underpinnings of settler-colonial spaces. The ISA Toronto 2014 Call for Papers emphasizes the role of geopolitics in International Relations. The aim of this CFP is to facilitate the organization of panels that examine intersections between Indigeneity, settler-colonial spaces, and International Relations theory, including the gendered, racialized, classed, aesthetic, cosmological, and political economic dimensions of this under-theorized aspect of IR.
Since the early 2000s, numerous interventions in IR have done much to deconstruct the Eurocentric foundations of the discipline by inflecting it with anti-colonial, postcolonial, and decolonial perspectives (Agathangelou and Ling 2009; Barkawy and Laffey 2006; Blaney and Inayatullah 2004; Chowdhry…

View original post 333 more words

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s